## Non-noetherian local ring with finitely generated maximal ideal

Some time ago I found the following interesting lemma on the stackproject:

**Theorem:** (tag/05GH) Let be a finitely generated ideal in a ring . Then the -adic completion is noetherian if so is .

**Corollary:** Let be a complete local ring with a finitely generated maximal ideal . Then is noetherian.

This corollary turns out to be actually quite useful in some examples.

The natural question is whether this corollary holds without the completeness assumption. A positive answer in this direction is given by the following theorem:

**Theorem:** (Cohen) Let be a ring such that any prime ideal is finitely generated. Then is a Noetherian ring.**Proof:** Matsumura “Commutative Ring Theory” Theorem 3.4.

However, it turns out that the answer is negative if one only assumes that all maximal ideals are finitely generated.

**Proposition:** There is a non-noetherian local ring with a finitely generated maximal ideal .

I don’t know if there is an easy way to construct such a ring (see UPD at the end of the post for some other examples). I’ll explain a construction that uses the notion of ultraproducts.

Before we start the construction, we choose an arbitrary nontrivial ultrafilter (any ultrafilter that contains a filter of cofinite sets) on the set of natural numbers . We note that such an ultrafilter exists by Zorn’s lemma (ultrafilters are exactly maximal filters). In what follows, we will say just say “ultraproduct” instead of “ultraproduct with respect to the chosen nontrivial ultrafilter”.

Now we pick any local principal ideal ring with a non-nilpotent maximal ideal (for example, the ring works). We define to be the ultraproduct of the countable number of copies of (relative to the chosen ultrafilter).

We remind the reader that is defined as the quotient of the countable product by the relation if the set of indices where lies in the chosen ultrafilter (we say that *almost everywhere*).

We have the natural surjective map

**Lemma 1:** Let be a field. Then the ultraproduct is a field.

**Proof:** Consider any nonzero element and any of its representatives . Since is nonzero, the set of indices where does not lie in the ultrafilter. This implies that the set of indices, where lies in the ultrafilter. Therefore, the class is equal to the class defined as if and otherwise . Then and the class is the inverse of . So the element is invertible.

**Lemma 2:** Let be a local ring with the maximal ideal . Then the ultraproduct is a local ring with the maximal ideal (ultraproduct of the ideals with respect to the ultrafilter chosen above) and the residue field .

**Proof:** There is the natural map . This map is obviously injective. The image is an ideal in since it consists exactly of the classes that have a representative , where all coordinates lie in the maximum ideal .

*Step 1: The ideal is maximal.* We note that to check that this ideal is maximal, it suffices to check that because Lemma 2 guarantees that the right side of the equality is a field.

There is the natural map and lies in the kernel of this map. This induces the natural map that we need to check that it is an isomorphism. Surjectivity is clear. So only the injectivity needs to be checked.

Indeed, let the class go to zero in . This means that, for almost all indices , we have . Let us now define the element as if , and otherwise. So but now the class clearly lies in . Thus, .

*Step 2: The ring ** is local.* It is equivalent to show that any element that does not lie in the maximum ideal is invertible.

Choose any element . Then the set of indices such that does not lie in our ultrafilter. Therefore, the set of indices such that lies in the ultrafilter. Let’s do the standard trick with replacing the sequence with the sequence defined by the rule , if , and otherwise. Then and is clearly invertible with the inverse . This finishes the proof of Lemma 2.

Now let’s return to our case when is a local principal ideal domain with the maximum ideal . Then Lemma 2 tells us that is a local ring with the maximal ideal . It follows from the definition that is principal and is generated by the element . Therefore, is a local ring with a principal maximum ideal. It remains to prove that it cannot be Noetherian.

Recall that Krull’s Intersection Theorem says that the intersection if is a local noetherian ring. We will show that this is not the case for .

Consider the element in . Obviously, lies in the maximum ideal . Now we note that since the ultrafilter contains all cofinite subsets of and so changing any finite number of elements does not change the class in the ultraproduct. But now lies in . Similarly, the element lies in . Keep going to get that . Thus,

The last thing left to check is that the constructed element is not zero. This is exactly the place where we need to use the non-nilpotency condition on the ideal . Indeed, let us assume that . This means that the set of indices such that lies in our ultrafilter. An empty set does not lie in an ultrafilter from the definition of an ultrafilter. Therefore, there is some such that . But then this contradicts the non-nilpotency of the ideal . So .

Thus, we have verified that is a local ring with a principal maximal ideal, but is not itself Noetherian!

UPD: Gleb Terentiuk explained in the comments that there is an easier construction. Also, look here for some other examples.

For another example let us consider the ring of germs of functions on the real line near . Strictly speaking, elements of are equivalence classes but let me ignore it for simplicity and work with small enough neighborhoods. In this case consists of such that . Note that if then by the Hadamard’s lemma one can write where is a smooth function. Thus, the maximal ideal is generated by one element . Let us show that

To do this, let us check that if for , then . Let us proceed by induction, use the Hadamard’s lemma to write where is a smooth function. Note . Therefore, for . Thus, by induction hypotesis and therefore .

In particular, if is a function with for any , then . Therefore, is non-zero due to existence of non-analytic smooth functions. In particular, the ring is non-noetherian and its maximal ideal is generated by one element.

Thanks! Updated the post.

Test of LaTeX in comments. Inline equation . Display equation